The estimate of nutritional status by BMI can be performed with different cutoff points obtained in different studies; the criteria most often reported in the literature are those proposed by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF),19 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),20 and 21 and GSK1120212 by the World Health Organization (WHO).22 The percentile curves used by IOTF for children and adolescents aged 2 to 17 years define overweight as ≥ the 85th percentile and obesity ≥ the 95th percentile, identifying these points as similar to the cutoffs used for adults, which are 25 kg/m2 for overweight and 30 kg/m2 for obesity. The cutoffs used by the WHO for children

and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years define overweight as ≥ the 85th percentile and obesity as ≥ the 97th percentile. The CDC classification for children and adolescents aged from 2 to 19 years establishes overweight as ≥ the 85th percentile and obesity as ≥ the 95th percentile. Some studies used specific cutoffs for the study population, which differ from the aforementioned criteria.23 and 24 For studies that assessed the perception

of both parents, only the results related to the mother’s perception were extracted. Exclusion criteria were the presence, in the study samples, of diseases that affect nutritional status, such as eating disorders and genetic syndromes, as well as studies that were aimed at the perception of nutritional status in children with different types of cancer. The search was performed by two reviewers, separately, who selected studies first by reading Alectinib purchase the titles, then by reading the abstracts, and then proceeded to read the full article. In addition to the articles selected from the databases, a review of the references of each selected article was performed, in order to find studies that were not retrieved in the main article databases. Article eligibility was independently assessed by two reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved jointly by all authors. Considering that there is no article quality

assessment tool for descriptive and cross-sectional studies, and in order to meet the purpose of this study, a tool adapted by Rietmeijer-Mentink et al.25 was used in this review, which is based on the Cochrane criterion for the assessment of diagnostic studies (Table 1). Thus, the methodological quality Tacrolimus (FK506) of the articles that included a verbal description of the maternal perception regarding the nutritional status of their children was based on six items; the articles were categorized as low (zero to two positive items), moderate (three to four positive items), good (five positive items), and excellent quality (six positive items). The quality of the articles that used body image scales was based on seven items; the categorization was similar, except for the good (five to six positive items) and excellent quality (seven positive items) range.