The terminal units of wine samples were mainly comprised of catec

The terminal units of wine samples were mainly comprised of catechin (from 55% to 66%), as also observed in other studies for both grape skin and seed (Mattivi et al., 2009 and Pastor del Rio and Kennedy, 2006). Merlot 2007 and Syrah (2006 and 2007) wines showed the highest concentrations of the terminal unit catechin, followed by Cabernet Franc and Sangiovese wines. The highest proportions of this terminal unit were observed in all samples of 2006 vintage and in the Syrah 2007 wine. The epicatechin terminal unit had the Selleckchem Ponatinib second higher concentrations

and proportions (from 22% to 41%). The Merlot 2007 wine presented the highest concentrations and proportions of epicatechin terminal units (40.8%), followed by Cabernet Franc and Syrah 2007. The highest proportion of gallocatechin terminal units (10.8%) was found in the Sangiovese 2007 wine sample, followed by Syrah wines, in both vintages evaluated (2.5%),

while the lowest was found in Merlot 2006 wine (0.6%). The highest percentage of epigallocatechin (8.2%) was, as for gallocatechin, found in buy PS-341 Sangiovese 2007. Epicatechin gallate was the only gallate-derivative found in terminal units, and only in samples from the 2007 vintage, corresponding to an average of 0.15% of the terminal units. Usually, concentrations of the gallates as terminal units in wines are low, or even undetectable (Fernández et al., 2007 and Monagas et al., 2003). This finding has also been observed in grape skins (Chira et al., 2009 and Mattivi et al., 2009). The extension units present in lowest concentrations were catechin and epicatechin gallate (Table 3). The extension unit catechin represented up to 1.0% of the total extension units and epicatechin gallate up to 2.9%. Extension units of wine only samples mainly comprised epicatechin and epigallocatechin, with a predominance of epicatechin, which represented more than 44% of the extension units. A similar profile has been observed

by other researchers (Pastor del Rio and Kennedy, 2006 and Prieur et al., 1994) with a small variation among varieties. Epicatechin represented 44.9–61.2% of all extension units, while epigallocatechin represented 36–46% of all extension units, suggesting a high contribution of proanthocyanidins from grape skins in the wine samples evaluated. Comparing the two vintages, it was found that total PAs in the wine samples from the 2006 vintage was significantly lower than for the 2007 vintage. The total concentration of the extension units in the 2007 vintage was significantly higher than in wines of the previous vintage (p ⩽ 0.05). This is probably due to climatic differences observed between the two vintage years evaluated. In the 2007 the temperature and the GDD values observed were higher than in the previous year (data not shown). Many authors have confirmed that the sun exposure, temperature and GDD positively influence the PA concentration ( Pastor del Rio & Kennedy, 2006).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>