2A). Furthermore, animals were learn more immunized

with phOx emulsified in CFA and again a significant activation of BM eosinophils and an enhanced expression of cytokine mRNA were observed. Indeed, primary immunization with alum-precipitated phOx or injection of phOx emulsified in CFA equally activated eosinophils (Fig. 2B). These data show that the activation of eosinophils is independent of the type of adjuvant used for primary immunization. The specific effect of antigen on eosinophil activation and cytokine expression was even more pronounced when animals were boosted with soluble phOx. Six days after a secondary challenge with soluble antigen, a considerable increase in the level of IL-4, IL-6 and APRIL mRNA was seen, but only in animals which had previously been primed with antigen. No increase was seen in animals primed with alum alone or with PBS (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, even 60 days after antigenic boost, which is 4 months after priming the immune response with alum and antigen, eosinophils still showed enhanced levels of cytokine expression (Fig. 2A). Thus, antigen-dependent activation of the immune system leads to a stable production of mRNA for the plasma cell survival factors APRIL, IL-6, IL-10 and also TNF-α (Fig. 2C). Staining eosinophils with

APRIL and IL-6-specific antibodies showed that upon secondary immunization, BM eosinophils carry abundant APRIL and IL-6 protein in their granules (Fig. 2C). To investigate whether immunization with the T-cell-dependent antigen phOx affects the numbers of eosinophils in PLX4032 BM and spleen, animals were immunized with antigen, which had been Autophagy activator either precipitated

with alum or emulsified in CFA. In the first days after primary immunization, the percentage of CD11bintGr-1loSiglec-Fhi eosinophils increased in both BM and spleen (Fig. 3A). Maximal frequencies of eosinophils were found in the BM 6 days after immunization, whereas in the spleen the highest values were observed only on day 12 (Fig. 3B). In the BM, elevated levels of eosinophils were observed even 60 days after primary immunization. In contrast, the frequency of eosinophils in spleen declined with time after primary immunization to nearly baseline levels (Fig. 3B). Boosting animals with soluble antigen induced a further increase in the frequency of eosinophils in spleen and BM (Fig. 3B). In both, animals primed with phOx-CSA/alum or phOx-CSA/CFA, the number of eosinophils found in the BM 6 days after secondary immunization was even higher than after primary immunization (Fig. 3B). After secondary challenge with antigen, the rise in the number of eosinophils was only transient. Indeed, 12 days after the secondary boost eosinophil numbers were back down to the level present before the injection of soluble antigen (Figs. 3 and 4).