41 Patients in the combined treatment group, however, had fewer symptom peaks during the maintenance phase. The definition of recovery A basic problem in the criteria developed by Frank and associates2 is the lack of criteria forjudging a patient, to be asymptomatic. The fact that a patient no longer meets syndromal criteria is insufficient and the number and quality of minimal symptoms allowed arc not specified. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Not, all symptoms are equally important.14,15 For instance, persistence of depressed mood is different,

from lack of concentration in an improved depressed patient. Often different treatments arc generally compared on the rate of response they may yield, instead of the amount, of residual symptomatology they may leave. Unfortunately, currently used scales for assessing

treatment outcome, such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, are inadequate for assessing the wide spectrum of residual symptomatology.6 Further, the concept, of recovery should involve psychological well-being.1 Finally, Frank Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and associates2 emphasized the connection between the declaration of recovery and the possibility that treatment can be discontinued or prolonged only for preventive purposes. The symptomatic state of patients who are drug-free could be equated, in this Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical case, to that of patients receiving continuation therapy. As a result, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the criteria for recovery2 seem to need a multidimensional redefinition, which reflects the clinician’s orientation and prognosis, aside from a symptomatic assessment. Fava and colleagues1 have recently suggested a new set of criteria for defining recovery that encompass psychological wellbeing (Table III). Table III Definition of recovery.1 Commonly, the concept of recovery reflects that of “improvement,”

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical which refers to the Alisertib nmr clinical distance along which the current, state of the patient is compared with the pretreatment position. In this sense, recovery can be expressed cither as a categorical variable (present/absent) or as a comparative category (nonrecovered, slightly recovered, moderately recovered, greatly recovered). Bay 11-7085 Both expressions require arbitrary cutoff points related to the amount of improvement. A depressed patient who, when asked how he or she feels after 3 weeks of treatment replies “just fine” (instead of “better”), uses a selfmonadic component. The amount of change induced by treatment, however, may make him/her overlook the distance from an intended goal, such as the pre-episode state. The physician may collude with the patient, in this illusion of wellness, since he/she may be gratified more by the amount of improvement induced in the patient, than by the current, distance from an intended goal.1 Clinicians may choose recovery as a target that is negotiated between the doctor and the patient.