A Descriptive Quantitative Analysis was performed in accordance with Stone and Sidel (1993). Fourteen panellists, out of the 39 recruited, were preselected through a basic taste recognition test (minimum of 6 correct responses in a total of 9 solutions; Meilgaard, Civille, & Carr, 1999), an odour recognition test (minimum of 7 correct responses ABT-199 solubility dmso in a total of
10 odours; Meilgaard et al., 1999) and triangle tests using the sequential analysis of Wald (Shirose & Mori, 1984). The parameters of Wald analysis were: p0 = 1/3 (maximum unacceptable ability, that is, the probability of accidentally guessing correctly), p1 = 2/3 (minimum acceptable ability), α = 0.05 (probability of selecting
an unacceptable panellist, CP-868596 research buy without sensory acuity) and β = 0.10 (probability of not selecting an acceptable panellist). The sensory attributes were generated by the fourteen panellists, using the Kelly Repertory Grid method (Moskowitz, 1983). After discussions to reach a consensus, the descriptive terms that were most important for characterizing the appearance, aroma, texture and flavour of the cakes were selected. The sensory panel also defined the attributes, the references for each of these and the product evaluation form. After the training stage, which took seven sessions, the panellists were selected according to their discriminative capacity (Fsample ≤ 0.50), reproducibility capacity (Frepetition ≥ 0.05) and consensus with the panel (
ASTM, 1981; Damásio & Costell, 1991). Only eight of the fourteen panellists were selected to conduct analyses on the sensory profile of the cakes. The sensory analysis was performed in individual booths, under white light and temperature at 22 °C. The cakes were presented on plastic plates coded with three-digit random numbers and Thiamet G were evaluated in quadruplicate by the eight panellists. The sample presentation was balanced with complete blocks that were randomized and monadic and an unstructured linear intensity scale of 90 mm length was used for each descriptor. The means of the sensory attributes were compared using variance analysis followed by the Tukey test (significant difference when p ≤ 0.05), using the PASW Statistics 18 software (SPSS Inc.). The results were also subjected to Principal Component Analysis, using the Statistica 7.0 software (StatSoft, Inc.). The standard cake and cakes with prebiotics were compared to three commercially produced orange cakes regarding sensory acceptability and preference. The acceptability of the appearance, aroma, texture and flavour and the overall acceptability were evaluated using a verbal hedonic scale of nine points (1 – disliked extremely; 5 – neither liked nor disliked; 9 – liked extremely) (Meilgaard et al., 1999).