Additionally, the post translational modification of AMPK B1, that is, myristoylation and phosphorylation, http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html could affect AMPK activity. Based on these findings, we believe that re duced e pression of AMPK B1 diminishes the amount of AMPK heterotrimeric comple es and their activity in aggressive, advanced ovarian cancer cells. Our findings on the negative regulation of the AKT pathway by AMPK B1 is in line with those reported by Feng et al. AMPK B1 has been found to be a stress responsive gene that can be induced in a p53 dependent or p53 independent manner, therefore, induction of AMPK B1 e pression could negatively regulate the IGF 1 AKT mTOR pathways. The ability to simultaneously upregulate AMPK activity and down regulate AKT signal ing leads to cell growth inhibition.

Moreover, AMPK B1 overe pression could inhibit ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion, and this effect is most likely mediated through the down regulation of the JNK pathway. We have previously demonstrated that down regulation of the JNK pathway using a JNK inhibitor significantly inhibited cell motility. Similarly, inhibition of the AKT and ERK pathways using their respective inhibitors, wort mannin and U0126, could reduce cell proliferation rates, which indicates the importance of AMPK B1 e pression in controlling cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Indeed, AMPK B1 e pression correlates well with clinicopathologic data, which show that early stage tumors have high levels of AMPK B1, whereas advanced stage, high grade or metastatic ovarian cancers have lower AMPK B1 levels.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the e pression level of AMPK B1 is able to determine the amount of AMPK heterotrimeric comple es and, hence, the activity level of AMPK in advanced ovarian cancer cells. Downreg ulation of AMPK B1 seems to be another mechanism that leads to lower AMPK activity in advanced ovarian cancer cells. Based on the data showing that enforced e pression of AMPK B1 elevates AMPK activity but decreases AKT, ERK and JNK activities as well as abrogates its oncogenic capacities in cell growth, migration, invasion and sensitizing chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin induced cell apoptosis, AMPK B1 may be a potential therapeutic target in advanced ovarian cancer treatment.

Introduction BRAF GSK-3 inhibitors such as vemurafenib or dabrafenib ef ficiently block signaling downstream of the mutated BRAFV600 protein, which initially results in profound growth inhibition of the melanoma cells and high frequency of tumor regression in the clinic. However, the clinical use of these agents is limited by development of acquired drug resistance. Accumulating data suggest that a single resistance mechanism does not account for acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors instead a diverse array of mutations and signaling alterations has been de scribed.