aureus (gram-positive), and of fungal suspensions of C albicans

aureus (gram-positive), and of fungal suspensions of C. albicans. In their study, polylysine conjugate was highly effective against fungal and bacterial suspensions, click here although

lower concentrations were required for bacterial (0.75 μM) than for fungal inactivation (5 μM). Toluidine blue needed concentration and light doses of 10 μM and 32 J/cm2 to promote S. aureus inactivation, 35 μM and 32 J/cm2 to promote E. coli inactivation, and 50 μM and 40 J/cm2 to promote C. albicans inactivation. Moreover, to cause cell inactivation with Rose Bengal as a PS, it was necessary to use 0.25 μM and 4 J/cm2 for S. aureus, 35 μM and 8 J/cm2 for E. coli, and 200 μM and from 40 to 80 J/cm2 for C. albicans. Thus, C. albicans was shown to be more resistant

to PDT, when compared with bacteria, which may be attributed to differences in cell size. Candida species are approximately 25–50 times larger than bacterial cells. 27, 39 and 51 Furthermore, as an eukaryotic microorganism, the presence of a nuclear membrane could act as an additional barrier to the PS. 39 and 51 This study showed the effectiveness of Cur-mediated PDT on the photoinactivation of the three evaluated Candida species. For the planktonic cultures of Candida spp. the results demonstrated that different PITs presented no statistical differences in photoinactivation of any of the evaluated species. In addition, the association of 20 μM Cur and LED light, after 5, 10 and 20 min of PIT promoted complete inactivation of the C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. dubliniensis cells. These results are in agreement this website with Dahl et al. 36 whose study demonstrated that a long PIT is not required for Cur phototoxicity. 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase In their study, the authors obtained photoinactivation of

both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria with Cur at 1 and 10 μM, respectively, which is less than the concentration required in the present study for the photoinactivation of Candida species. Furthermore, they observed that the Cur which remained in contact with bacterial cells for different times before irradiation did not significantly modify its phototoxic effects. Also, the removal of Cur before illumination promoted a significant reduction in its phototoxicity, suggesting that Cur in the extracellular bulk phase or loosely bound to the cells is responsible for most of the phototoxic effects. As a lipophillic molecule, Cur first interacts with the cell membrane and membrane bound proteins and is then distributed to different parts of the cell. 45 The nature of these interactions may justify the results obtained for the planktonic cultures of this study, in which an increase in PIT did not promote substantial alterations in photoinactivation of the three evaluated species. Furthermore, C. albicans and C. glabrata suspensions pre-incubated with 20 μM Cur for only 1 min resulted in 89.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>