Blood Analysis Twenty-four hours

after the last administration, rats were anesthetized with chloroform vapor, and blood samples were collected through cardiac punctures using heparinized and non heparinized centrifuge tubes. The heparinized blood was used for the total red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) counts,13 and heamatocrit.14 The non heparinized blood samples were allowed to clot before centrifugation (4000 rpm at +4°C for 10 min) to obtain serum samples, which were assessed for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), glucose, creatinine, total cholesterol and protein levels by standard methods Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical using relevant kits (Biosystem Reagents and Instruments). Organ Analysis Immediately after the blood collection, the liver, lung, heart, spleen and kidneys were carefully dissected out, blotted,

observed macroscopically and weighed immediately using a sartorius electronic balance. The relative organ weight (ROW) of each animal was then calculated as follows: ROW=Absolute-organ weight g×100Body Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical weight of rat on day of sacrifice (g) Organs tissues were thawed and homogenized 20 times (w/v) by homogeniser in ice-cold Tris-HCl KCl buffer (pH 7.4). The homogenate samples were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 30 min, and the supernatants were then used for enzyme and total protein assays using the method cited above. Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 12.0). The experimental results were expressed as the mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Group comparisons were performed using One Way ANOVA followed by Waller-Duncan Post Hoc test. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical significant. Ethics The FGFR activation experiments were carried out observing the welfare of animals as recommended by World Health Organization (WHO).15 Moreover, all procedures involving animals were carried out in strict compliance with the rules and regulations of local Ethics Committee. Results Chemical Analysis One known compound: 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside of sitosterol (1), and a mixture of β-sitosterol, stigmasterol and n-hexadecanoid Montelukast Sodium acid (2) were isolated from CH2Cl2 : MeOH (1:1) extract of C. edulis stem bark (figure 1). Figure 1 Chemical structures of 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside of sitosterol (1) and a mixture of β-sitosterol, stigmasterol and n-hexadecanoid acid (2) Antidermatophytic Activity The results of the antidermatophytic activities of the crude extract, fractions and compounds from C. edulis are presented in tables 1 and ​and2.2. It appeared that the extract and fractions F2 and F3 were able to prevent the total growth of all studied microorganisms at the concentrations examined (table 1). The other samples showed less antifungal activities. The most sensitive fungi were Microsporum audouinii and Epidermophyton floccoseum (table 2).