Despite its recent arrival on the market of anti-infective

agents, DAP-resistant mutants have already been reported [9–12]. To prevent the occurrence of resistant mutants (especially in the presence of foreign bodies) [13–16] and to limit the increase in staphylococcal minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [17, 18], some authors [19, 20] suggest increasing the daily dose of DAP. Clinical experience with a dose >6 mg/kg is limited, but data reported to date suggest that DAP is safe and well-tolerated [20–22]. In this report, we present our center’s experience with high-dose DAP for empirical treatment of PVGI during the very crucial post-operative period, and as treatment adapted to microbiological results. Methods The present study was retrospectively conducted from January Selleckchem LEE011 2008 to December 2010 and included all patients treated with DAP for PVGI at our regional referral centers for these infections (University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France and Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of DAP at daily dosages >8 mg/kg in patients with PVGI. This study was approved by the institutional review boards

of Dron Hospital and the University Hospital of Lille. All patients included in this study were informed and gave their consent. As in our previous studies [3], as there is no standard definition Talazoparib cost for diagnosis of definite or suspected PVGI, we used criteria proposed by FitzGerald et al. [1]. A patient was considered as suffering triclocarban from clear-cut PVGI if at least two of the following three criteria were present: (a) positive bacterial culture of intraoperative

specimens or blood samples (for potentially contaminant bacteria, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, Propionibacterium acnes, or corynebacteria, at least two intraoperative specimens or blood samples or at least one intraoperative specimen and one blood culture were required); (b) clinical signs of infection in the area of the prosthesis; (c) biological or other radiological signs of infection (perigraft air or fluid persisting for more than 8 weeks post-operatively; abscess). Each case of definite infection was classified as early-onset infection when occurring within 4 months after surgery or as late-onset infection when occurring more than 4 months after surgery. PVGI or stent infection was suspected when bacteremia involving a site other than the surgical site occurred in the early post-operative period (within 4 weeks of graft or stent implantation) [23, 24]. PVGI was documented only by intraoperative or blood samples. Superficial samples were excluded. Multiple intraoperative samples were cultured on blood agar plates with standard aerobic and anaerobic methods. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were interpreted in accordance with recommendations of the “Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie” [25].