From our refractive index measurements, there was no statisticall

From our refractive index measurements, there was no statistically significant difference between and n COOH. This suggests that there are very little changes in the local dielectric environment of protonated/deprotonated GNR-MUA nanoparticles. Therefore, our observation is not concordant with the equation mentioned above. However, the adsorption of thiol organic molecules can lead to the formation of microscopic surface dipoles that will modify the energy level alignment

at the interface in both bulk and quantum dot semiconductors as observed in photovoltaic applications [41]. Here, the dipole moments calculated OICR-9429 clinical trial by DFT method for protonated and deprotonated MUA are 0.7 and 27.5 Debye, respectively (Figure  6). Thus, it is plausible that the redshift observed at higher pH is attributed to a relatively higher dipole moment of MUA as it is deprotonated. It is noteworthy that the formation of Au-thiol covalent bond shifts the LSPR to shorter wavelengths by approximately 10 nm, and it is due to the electron-donating nature of the sulfur headgroup in the molecule [42]. This means that the occurrence of the blueshift upon GNR happened while additional AZD2281 electrons were gained, while a redshift happened when part of the electrons were lost from the surface of GNR. The protonated/deprotonated MUA ligand that caused changes in the dipole moment of molecules may trigger various degrees

of electron pulling force (the carboxyl groups of MUA are electron-withdrawing groups [43]). At a high pH, a larger electron-pulling force that restrains the electron-donating process of sulfur atom on MUA to the Au rod may cause the shift of LSPR to longer wavelengths, while a relative blueshift of LSPR occurs for GNR-MUA for a lower pH (Figure  6). Figure 6 Schematic of electron-pulling force. On GNR-MUA to cause Proteases inhibitor blue/red wavelength shift of LSPR at low and high pH. Conclusions In conclusion, a pH-dependent wavelength shift has been observed in GNR-MUA, which suggests

that the charges formed on the surface of GNR after protonation/deprotonation of the carboxylic ligands of MUA play an important role by modulating LSPR phenomenon around the functionalized gold nanorods. Otherwise, -CH3-terminated ligand (CTAB or MUA) is independent of pH. The free MUA in the solution will not affect the LSPR shifting. In addition, we confirmed that the LSPR shifting is neither aggregation-induced optical signal nor the change of ionic strength. The LSPR shift of GNR is attributed to the dipole moment change after protonation/deprotonation of carboxylic groups of MUA. This GNR-MUA-based sensor can offer a 5-nm shift of LSPR for a unit change of pH value. Although the sensitivity of this GNR-MUA still has room for further improvement, such a stable and easily prepared GNR-MUA has potential to become efficient and promising pH nanosensors to study intra- or extra-cellular pH in a wide range of chemical or biological systems.

Comments are closed.