However, all siRNAs were capable of prolonging cell survival, albeit to different extents. This protective effect was most pronounced for cells transfected with the E1A siRNA. Although such cells displayed severe cytopathic effects and were already partially detached from the culture vessels, the culture viability was remarkably high (>80%) at 6 days post-infection. We repeated the experiment using lower and higher MOIs (2 TCID50/cell and 6 TCID50/cell, respectively) and obtained comparable Selleckchem PF 01367338 results with a tendency towards higher and lower protection at decreased and increased MOIs, respectively (data not shown). The observed protective effect

of the E1A siRNA could not be attributed to a possible unspecific general increase in cellular metabolic activity, because neither the E1A siRNA nor any of the other siRNAs altered

the viability of uninfected cells (Supplementary Fig. 6). Thus, although the E1A siRNA did not inhibit the output of infectious virus progeny as efficiently as did the DNA polymerase siRNA, it enhanced the viability of infected cells and kept them alive for a prolonged time period. In the present study, we evaluated a larger panel of potential targets, and also determined the inhibitory effect of siRNAs on wild-type adenovirus. SiRNAs directed against the E1A, DNA polymerase, http://www.selleckchem.com/products/SRT1720.html pTP, and IVa2 transcripts were all capable of efficiently silencing the respective genes in the course of an adenovirus infection. By contrast, although having displayed a comparable silencing capacity in luciferase reporter assays, the hexon- and protease-directed siRNAs, showed only a limited capacity to reduce the number of ML transcripts. This observation can be attributed to the markedly higher amounts of hexon and protease mRNAs generated

from the particularly strong MLP, in comparison with the mRNA levels of the other genes. This high number of MLP-derived late mRNAs may become even more problematic in RNAi-based attempts to inhibit adenovirus multiplication, because the virus-associated RNAs (VA-RNAs) I and II (non-coding RNAs produced in low amounts during the early stages of infection, but in vast amounts at later 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase time points) appear to counteract RNAi. This effect is thought to be partially caused by the incorporation into and saturation of the RISC by VA-RNA subfragments, which behave like miRNAs (Andersson et al., 2005). Thus, siRNA-mediated inhibition of adenovirus gene expression during the early stages of infection may generally be more beneficial than inhibition of late-stage gene expression. In this regard, inhibition of viral DNA replication may be particularly advantageous, because a decrease in viral genome copy numbers should significantly lower VA-RNA gene copy numbers.