In addition, we suggest that somewhere in the decade of debate re

In addition, we suggest that somewhere in the decade of debate regarding how to define the onset of the Anthropocene in a manner that will conform to the guidelines of the International Commission on Stratigraphy of the International Union of Geological Sciences in designating geological time units, the basic underlying reason for creating geological time units has been overlooked. The value of designating a new Anthropocene epoch rests SB431542 on its utility in defining a general area of scientific inquiry – in conceptually framing a broad research question. Like the Holocene epoch, the value of an Anthropocene epoch can be measured by its practical value: The Holocene is really just

the last of a series of interglacial climate phases that

have punctuated the severe icehouse climate of the past 2Myr. We distinguish it as an epoch for practical purposes, in that many of the surface bodies of sediment on which we live – the soils, river deposits, deltas, coastal plains and so on – were formed during this time. ( Zalasiewicz et al., 2011a, p. 837) [emphasis added] In considering the practical or utility value of designating a new Anthropocene epoch, the emphasis, the primary focus, we think, should be placed on gaining a greater understanding of the long-term and richly complex role played by human societies in altering trans-isomer in vitro the earth’s biosphere (e.g., Kirch, 2005). This proposed deep time consideration of significant ecosystem

engineering efforts by human societies provides a clear alternative to the shallow temporal focus on the major effects of human activities over the last two centuries that defines the Industrial Revolution consensus: While human effects may be detected in deposits thousands of years old…major unequivocal global change is of more recent date… It is the scale and rate of change that are relevant here, rather than the agent of change (in this case humans). (Zalasiewicz et al., 2011b, p. 1049) In turning attention to the agent of change – patterns of human activity intended to modify the earth’s ecosystems, the beginning of the Anthropocene epoch can be established by determining when unequivocal evidence of significant Edoxaban human ecosystem engineering or niche construction behaviors first appear in the archeological record on a global scale. As we discuss below, there is a clear and unequivocal hard rock stratigraphic signal on a global scale that marks the initial domestication of plants and animals and defines the onset of the Anthropocene. Ecosystem engineering or niche construction is not, of course, a uniquely human attribute. Many animal species have been observed to modify their surroundings in a variety of ways, with demonstrable impact on their own evolutionary trajectories and those of other affected species (e.g., the beaver (Castor canadensis) ( Odling-Smee et al., 2003).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>