In conclusion, patient-centered and quality of life outcome measures are an important part of evaluating the usefulness of FFR of lower extremity wounds. Without procedure-specific assessments currently available, these outcomes can be easily measured using standardized questionnaires such as
the SF-12 or SF-36. We have shown that microsurgical flap reconstruction is a valuable reconstructive option in high-risk patients and offers a HRQoL comparable with that of the general population. In addition, successful ambulation in patients who have undergone FFR improves HRQoL, whereas quality of life is decreased significantly when failure to ambulate occurs. “
“Literature on the reconstruction of the proximal femur in skeletally immature patients with the use of an epiphyseal transplant is scarce and with variable results depending on the indication. We report GPCR Compound Library successful outcomes using https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Y-27632.html a modified vascularized fibular epiphyseal transplant in a 4-year-old boy with an oncologic lesion. We discuss the advantages of supplementing the standard graft with a vascularized fibular periosteal tissue. The vascularized fibular epiphyseal transplant (VFET) is an effective option in the reconstruction of the epiphysis in skeletally immature patients, owing to the
advantage of restoring both the joint function and the growth potential in a single surgical operation.1 Multiple reported cases demonstrate the effectiveness of this complex technique in upper extremity reconstruction.1,2 However, literature is scarce regarding its use for the reconstruction of the proximal femur and hip joint.3-5 Through this article, we report the use of a VFET in the reconstruction of a proximal femur in a 4-year-old boy after an intra-articular wide excision of an epithelioid hemangioendotelioma. We also discuss Aspartate the advantages of designing the flap as a composite
vascularized epiphyseo-osteo-periosteal flap.6 © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012. “
“Two cases are reported of flap loss following microsurgical perforator flap breast reconstruction in patients diagnosed with a factor V Leiden mutation. Factor V Leiden is the most common inherited cause of hypercoagulability, leading to an increased risk of thrombotic events. The first patient underwent a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap and then had recurrent arterial thrombosis both intraoperatively and postoperatively. This patient was subsequently diagnosed with a factor V Leiden mutation. The second patient had a known factor V Leiden mutation and underwent a superior gluteal artery perforator flap, which developed thrombosis and flap loss 2 days later. Preoperative assessment of a personal or family history of unexplained venous or arterial thrombosis should prompt suspicion of a factor V Leiden mutation.