In this trial 133 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and had a minimum followup of more than 15 years.

Results: Cancer specific survival was 81.9%, 79.5% and 76.7%, and progression-free survival with bladder preservation was 75.5%, 64.9% and 57.8% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Patient age had a negative impact on overall survival on univariate NVP-BSK805 mw (HR 0.842, p = 0.049) and multivariate analyses (HR

1.062, p = 0.000), and according to median and quartile age stratifications (p = 0.000 and p = 0.000, respectively). However, age did not have a negative impact on cancer specific survival even when following the same stratifications. Although progression and recurrence were concentrated during the first 3 years (70% and 65%, respectively), both steadily increased afterward. A followup schedule was developed according to this sequence of events.

Conclusions: Radical transurethral bladder tumor resection is a reliable therapeutic approach for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer after complete tumor resection and with negative biopsies of the tumor bed. These results are consistent in all age ranges.”
“Purpose:

Studies suggest lowering the threshold of the prostate specific antigen test in obese men due to the hemodilution effect but prostate specific antigen may be affected by prostate volume and insulin resistance, which also increase with obesity.

Thus, we examined the combined effect of these factors on prostate specific antigen.

Materials MK-4827 and Methods: We analyzed 3,461 Korean men 30 to 80 years old with prostate volume data available who underwent routine evaluation. We examined the effect of plasma volume, homeostatic model assessment index, prostate volume and body mass index on prostate specific antigen, and prostate specific antigen 4EGI-1 datasheet mass and mass ratio (total circulating prostate specific antigen protein per prostate volume) by the trend test and/or ANOVA after adjusting for age and/or prostate volume.

Results: Body mass index had positive associations with plasma volume, the homeostatic model assessment index and prostate volume (p for trend <0.01). Prostate specific antigen had a positive association with prostate volume and a negative association with plasma volume (p for trend <0.01) but not with homeostatic model assessment index. The adjusted R-2 of prostate volume vs prostate specific antigen was greater than for plasma volume vs prostate specific antigen while for body mass index vs prostate volume it was less than for body mass index vs plasma volume (0.0892, 0.0235, 0.1346 and 0.3360, respectively). Prostate specific antigen mass was not associated with plasma volume or body mass index but it was still associated with prostate volume after adjusting for plasma volume or body mass index (p for trend <0.01).