Prof P believes Chris can directly access the beliefs, attitudes and motivations of keyboard workers. He needs to get inside the participants heads and report accurately on this. Chris should avoid subjectivity and transparency, rather questions should be asked in a detached and depersonalized manner to ensure he obtains the participants’ real thoughts. He needs

to be as invisible, detached and unobtrusive as possible. Chris needs to pick up inconsistencies or errors in the participants views and return the transcriptions to check for accuracy. Chris’ views need to be set-aside during the interviews so that he does not influence the findings. Prof P believes the study should be able to be replicated elsewhere with similar results. Chris should use multiple observers to verify his own observations and if possible triangulate several different sources of data to Fluorouracil increase accuracy of the data. All the data should first be collected and then analysis should be done, ideally using a predefined ICG-001 and repeatable method. It will be an advantage to ask peers to also analyse parts of the data to ensure there is agreement in the coding process. Prof P considers a follow up survey would then test the generalisability of the results. From the

case example, it can be seen that each professor holds very different epistemological views. There is internal consistency in their views of what they consider will create trustworthy knowledge, but they are not compatible with each other. The student’s own view of what counts as knowledge will help decide which direction to take. How he also manages the divergent views of his professors is thankfully another story for another paper! What this case highlights is that the epistemological position adopted by the researcher, directly influences methodology and methods used. The relationship between epistemology, methodology,

methods and knowledge creation is explained in Fig. 2. A summary of the ten qualitative research studies published in Manual Therapy is provided in Table 5. Typically, the articles have not made explicit the ontological and epistemological assumptions of the study, however Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase hints appear from the way in which they have conducted the study. For example, Smart and Doody (2007) and Sweeney and Doody (2010) have followed case study as described by Yin, 1994 and Yin, 2003, who comes from a positivist position. This stance is further borne out by the controls put in place to: view the videotapes in a set order and with the same pauses for each participant; during analysis pre-determined codes are used and intra- and inter-coder reliability are tested. This sits in contrast to Petty et al. (2011a), who used a case study approach within an interpretivist paradigm whereby the interview guide changed with subsequent interviews and no attempt was made to determine reliability.