Table S2. List of primers used in this study. Figure S1. Gene expression analysis during different stages of interaction with B. Epacadostat in vivo cinerea (Cr-Bc) or F. graminearum Selleckchem Citarinostat (Cr-Fg). Figure S2. Schematic representation of deletion cassettes and characterization of mutant strains using PCR and RT-PCR. Figure S3. The ΔHyd1ΔHyd3 mutant showed reduced conidial surface hydrophobicity. Figure S4. Tolerance of C. rosea strains mycelia to

abiotic stress. Figure S5. Expression analysis of Hyd2 in C. rosea WT, ΔHyd1, ΔHyd3 and ΔHyd1ΔHyd3 mutant strains. Figure legends to additional figures are described in detail in introduction section of additional file. (PDF 6 MB) References 1. Wessels JG: Hydrophobins: proteins that

change the nature of the fungal surface. Adv Microb Physiol 1997, 38:1–45.PubMedCrossRef Emricasan supplier 2. Wosten HA: Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Ann Rev Microbiol 2001, 55:625–646.CrossRef 3. Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setala T, Penttila ME: Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005, 29:877–896.PubMedCrossRef 4. Jensen BG, Andersen MR, Pedersen MH, Frisvad JC, Sondergaard I: Hydrophobins from Aspergillus species cannot be clearly divided into two classes. BMC Res Notes 2010, 3:344.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 5. Seidl-Seiboth V, Gruber S, Sezerman U, Schwecke T, Albayrak A, Neuhof T, von Dohren H, Baker SE, Kubicek CP: Novel hydrophobins from Trichoderma define a new hydrophobin subclass:

protein properties, evolution, regulation and processing. J Mol Evol 2011, 72:339–351.PubMedCrossRef 6. Whiteford JR, Spanu PD: Hydrophobins and the interactions between fungi and plants. Mol Plant Pathol 2002, 3:391–400.PubMedCrossRef 7. Bayry J, Aimanianda V, Guijarro JI, Sunde M, Latgé J-P: Hydrophobins-unique fungal proteins. PLOS Pathol 2012, 8:e1002700.CrossRef PRKD3 8. Talbot NJ, Kershaw MJ, Wakley GE, De Vries O, Wessels J, Hamer JE: MPG1 encodes a fungal hydrophobin involved in surface interactions during infection-related development of Magnaporthe grisea . Plant Cell 1996, 8:985–999.PubMedCentralPubMed 9. Kim S, Ahn IP, Rho HS, Lee YH: MHP1, a Magnaporthe grisea hydrophobin gene, is required for fungal development and plant colonization. Mol Microbiol 2005, 57:1224–1237.PubMedCrossRef 10. Zhang S, Xia YX, Kim B, Keyhani NO: Two hydrophobins are involved in fungal spore coat rodlet layer assembly and each play distinct roles in surface interactions, development and pathogenesis in the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana . Mol Microbiol 2011, 80:811–826.PubMedCrossRef 11. Sevim A, Donzelli BG, Wu D, Demirbag Z, Gibson DM, Turgeon BG: Hydrophobin genes of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum , are differentially expressed and corresponding mutants are decreased in virulence. Curr Genet 2012, 58:79–92.PubMedCrossRef 12.