BMC Microbiol 2012, 12:230 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


BMC Microbiol 2012, 12:230.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

34. Suerbaum S, Lohrengel M, Sonnevend A, Ruberg F, Kist M: Allelic diversity and recombination in Campylobacter jejuni . J Bacteriol 2001,183(8):2553–2559.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 35. Huson DH: SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Selleckchem NVP-LDE225 Bioinform 1998, 14:68–73.CrossRef 36. Brown AH, Feldman MW, Nevo E: Multilocus structure of natural populations of HORDEUM Selleckchem Poziotinib SPONTANEUM. Genetics 1980,96(2):523–536.PubMedCentralPubMed 37. De Las RB, Marcobal A, Muñoz R: Development of a multilocus sequence typing method for analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Microbiol 2006,152(Pt 1):85–93.CrossRef 38. Xu H, Sun Z, Liu W, Yu J, Song Y, Lv Q, Zhang J, Shao Y, Menghe B, Zhang H: Multilocus sequence typing of Lactococcus lactis from naturally fermented milk foods in ethnic minority areas of China. J Dairy Sci 2014. doi:10.3168/jds.2013–7738 39. Delorme C, Bartholini C, Bolotine A, Ehrlich SD, Renault P: Emergence DNA-PK inhibitor of a cell wall protease in the Streptococcus thermophilus population. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010,76(2):451–460.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 40. Meslier V, Loux V, Renault P: Genome sequence of Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides strain 4882, isolated from a dairy starter culture. J Bacteriol 2012,194(23):696–712.CrossRef

41. Nam SH, Choi SH, Kang A, Kim DW, Kim RN, Kim A, Park HS: Genome sequence of Leuconostoc argentinum KCTC 3773. J Bacteriol 2010,192(24):6490–6491.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 42. Chang JY, Chang HC: Identification of a replicon from pCC3, a cryptic plasmid from Leuconostoc citreum C4 derived from kimchi, and development of a new host-vector system. Biotechnol Lett 2009,31(5):685–696.PubMedCrossRef 43. Jeong SJ, Park JY, Lee HJ, Kim JH: Characterization of pFMBL1, a small cryptic plasmid isolated from Leuconostoc mesenteroides SY2. Plasmid 2007,57(3):314–323.PubMedCrossRef 44. Brito

L, Pavela Branched chain aminotransferase H: Presence and analysis of large plasmids in Oenococcus oeni . Plasmid 1999, 41:260–267.PubMedCrossRef 45. Ze’-Ze’ L, Tenreiro R, Pavela H: The Oenococcus oeni genome: physical and genetic mapping of a strain GM and comparison with the genome of a “divergent” strain, PSU-1. Microbiol 2000, 146:3195–3204. 46. Zavaleta AI, Martı’nez-Murcia AJ, Rodrı’guez-Varela F: 16S-23S rDNA intergenic sequences indicate that Leuconostoc oenos is phylogenetically homogeneous. Microbiol 1996, 142:2105–2114.CrossRef 47. Picozzi C, Bonacina G, Vigentini I, Foschino R: Genetic diversity in Italian Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis strains assessed by multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analyses. Microbiol 2010, 156:2035–2045.CrossRef 48. Passerini D, Beltramo C, Coddeville M, Quentin Y, Ritzenthaler P, Daveran-Mingot M-L, Le Bourgeois P: Genes but not genomes reveal bacterial domestication of Lactococcus lactis . PLoS ONE 2010,5(12):e15306.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef 49.

Experiments to investigate the expression and function of these g

Experiments to investigate the expression and function of these genes in vivo are in progress. Methods Bacterial strains and culture conditions Capmatinib purchase Bacteroides fragilis strains used in this study are presented in Table 7. All strains were purchased from the United Kingdom National Culture Collection (UKNCC) except

638R which was a kind gift from Dr Sheila Patrick, Queen’s University, Belfast. Both B. fragilis strains and B. thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 [42] were grown in an anaerobic chamber at 37°C. Cultures were grown without shaking in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth supplemented with 50 μg/ml hemin and 0.5 μg/ml menadione. Media for plating was made from Brain Heart Infusion agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood, 50 μg/ml

hemin and 0.5 μg/ml menadione. Bioinformatics and sequence analysis Members of the C10 protease family in B. fragilis were detected by BLAST analysis [43]. Sequences were aligned by CLUSTAL W [44] or T-Coffee [45]. Protein secondary structure was predicted using GorIV [46] and JPred [47]. Protein export signals were identified using the Geneticin algorithms using LipPred [23], LipoP [48], SignalP [25] and PSORTb [26]. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using VE-822 genetic-distance-based neighbour-joining algorithms [49] within MEGA Version 4.0 http://​www.​megasoftware.​net/​. Bootstrap analysis for 1000 replicates was performed to estimate the confidence of tree topology [50]. MegaBLAST [51] was used to search all NCBI genomes for Bfgi1 and Bfgi2. Molecular techniques Standard techniques were employed for molecular analysis [52]. Bacteroides genomic Pregnenolone DNA was prepared as described by [53]. Total microbial DNA was extracted from human faeces, collected under an ethically approved protocol, by a glass beads-Qiagen Stool kit method previously described [54]. PCR reactions were carried using 10-30 ng of genomic DNA from B. fragilis 638R as template and using Phusion Polymerase (New England Biolabs).

The primers Bfp3_F and Bfgi2_Int_F (Table 4) were used for detecting the attP sites for Bfgi2. Bfgi2_attB_F and Bfgi2_attB_R (Table 4) were used for determining the attB attachment sites for Bfgi2 integration. The primers TraQ_F and Int_F were used in testing for the presence of the circular intermediate for Bfgi1. Primers to detect the circular intermediate for both Bfgi1 and Bfgi2 were designed, pointing outwards, flanking the ends of each predicted element. Primers to detect the attB site in Bfgi2 were designed, pointing inwards, flanking the proposed excision point for the Bfgi2 prophage DNA. Total RNA isolation for Reverse Transcription analysis B. fragilis 638R and B. thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 were cultured under anaerobic conditions until early logarithmic phase and the cultures were then immediately centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4000 × g. Total RNA extraction from B. fragilis 638R and B.

single drug treatment; 0 01 < p < 0 05 (*, †, #), 0 001 < p < 0 0

single drug treatment; 0.01 < p < 0.05 (*, †, #), 0.001 < p < 0.01 (**, ††, ##), p < 0.001 (***, †††, ###)). There was a high inhibition of cell proliferation after single and combined treatments with SBI-0206965 chemical structure protons and DTIC, as compared to control cells (***, p < 0.001), and is given in Figure 2B. The effects of combined treatments were stronger than those of relevant single treatments, particularly regarding DTIC (†, p < 0.05; ††, p < 0.01 and ###, p < 0.001). LY411575 in vitro A reduction of cell survival vs. control,

as it is shown in Figure 2C, was obtained after single proton irradiation or combination of protons and DTIC (***, p < 0.001) and was in the same range. Single DTIC treatment provoked negligible cell inactivation. The effects of protons and FM or DTIC on cell cycle distribution Compared to untreated controls, proton irradiation of HTB140 cells induced a dose dependent increase of G1 cell population. FM

provoked a raise of G2 phase followed by a reduction of S phase with some changes in G0/G1 cell population. After combined treatments with protons and FM, there was an improvement of S and G2 phase followed by a decrease of G0/G1 cell population (Figure 3A). It appears that the major Smad inhibitor characteristic of combined treatment with respect to single protons or FM was an increase of S phase mostly compensated by a reduction of G0/G1 phase. Figure 3 Cell cycle analyses after single and combined treatments. Cell cycle analysis of HTB140 cells estimated by flow cytometry, after single and combined treatments with protons and FM (A) or protons and DTIC (B). Irradiation doses were 12 (I) and 16 (II) Gy, while drug concentrations were 100 (III) and 250 μM (IV). The percentage of cells in G0/G1, S and G2/M phase were obtained with the XL SYSTEM II software. Single DTIC treatment did not provoke changes in the cell cycle distribution as compared to control. It differed from proton effects by an increase in S and G2 cell population. Cell cycle distribution after combined application of protons and DTIC remained in the range Tideglusib of controls and single DTIC effects (Figure

3B). Discussion Radio- and chemoresistance of malignant melanoma can be related to the phenotypic heterogeneity, including different degrees of cellular pigmentation, diverse cell morphology and growth rate of variety of melanoma types [17, 18]. It has been shown that when using conventional radiation, the common radiosensitivity parameter, the surviving fraction at 2 Gy of different melanoma cell lines ranged from 0.36 to 0.96 [16, 19, 20]. The HTB140 human melanoma cells are among cell lines with the highest values, thus representing the limit case of cellular radioresistance. To increase the inactivation level these cells were irradiated with protons that have higher linear energy transfer than conventional radiation. Still, the surviving fraction at 2 Gy remained high with the value of 0.93 [16].

J Nanosci Nanotechno 2008, 8:5887–5895 CrossRef 65 Zhang X-Y, Hu

J Nanosci Nanotechno 2008, 8:5887–5895.CrossRef 65. Zhang X-Y, Hu A, Zhang T, Lei W, Xue X-J, Zhou Y, Duley WW: Self-assembly of large-scale and ultrathin silver nanoplate films with

tunable plasmon resonance properties. ACS Nano 2011, 5:9082–9092.CrossRef 66. Pietrobon B, McEachran M, Kitaev V: Synthesis of size-controlled faceted pentagonal silver nanorods with tunable plasmonic Tipifarnib in vitro properties and self-assembly of these nanorods. ACS Nano 2009, 3:21–26.CrossRef 67. Mahmoud MA, El-Sayed MA: Different plasmon sensing behavior of silver and gold nanorods. J Phys Chem Lett 2013, 4:1541–1545.CrossRef 68. Negri P, Dluhy RA: Ag nanorod click here based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy applied to bioanalytical sensing. J Biophotonics 2013, 6:20–35.CrossRef 69. Khlebtsov B, Khanadeev V, Khlebtsov N: Tunable depolarized light scattering from gold and gold/silver nanorods. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12:3210–3218.CrossRef 70. Taflove A: Computational Electrodynamics: Dibutyryl-cAMP The Finite-Difference

Time-Domain Method. Boston: Artech House; 1995. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions MYuT, BNK, VAK, and PST searched for the sample processing regimens, SEM, TEM, AFM, spectroscopic, and SERS measurements. MIS provided the opal-like substrates. VNB coordinated the project as a whole. MYuT provided a preliminary version of the manuscript. NGK analyzed all data, wrote the final version of the manuscript, and arranged all figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Silver nanostructures have

attracted much attention due to unique electrical, optical, and biocompatible properties that are applicable to chemical sensors, catalysts, interconnects in micro or nano devices, plasmonics, and photonics [1–5]. The chemical properties of Ag nanostructures are determined by their morphology, size, crystallographic plane, and alloying composition [6–8]. Among various silver nanostructures, nanoplates or nanosheets, particularly, have been intensively investigated because they have the size- and shape-sensitive surface plasmon resonance bands [1, 8–12]. Until now, two-dimensional 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase silver nanostructures have been fabricated using surfactants (capping agent) [6, 13], sacrificial materials [14], and hard templates (porous alumina) [15]. Although these methods have the merits of controlling the morphology and size of Ag nanostructures, they are complicated and costly. A chemical route without any surfactants led to the large-scale synthesis of micrometer-sized Ag nanosheets (approximately 15 μm in size and 28 nm in thickness) after the addition of a small quantity of H2PdCl4 as seeds for the growth of Ag nanosheets [16]. With such solution-based methods, colloidal nanosheets were randomly dispersed in a liquid before being used for their purposes.

Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:

R36 CrossRefPubMed 4 Stathopo

Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:

R36.CrossRefPubMed 4. Stathopoulou A, Vlachonikolis I, Mavroudis D, Perraki M, Kouroussis C, Apostolaki S, Malamos N, Kakolyris S, Kotsakis A, Xenidis N, Reppa D, Georgoulias V: Molecular detection of cytokeratin-19-positive cells in the peripheral blood of patients with operable breast cancer: evaluation of their prognostic significance. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20: 3404–3412.CrossRefPubMed 5. Masuda TA, Kataoka A, Ohno S, Murakami S, Mimori K, Utsunomiya T, Inoue H, Tsutsui S, Kinoshita J, Masuda N, Moriyama N, Mori M: Detection of occult cancer cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow by quantitative RT-PCR assay for cytokeratin-7 in breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol 2005, 26: 721–730.PubMed 6. Kwon S, Kang SH, Ro J, Jeon CH, Park JW, Lee ES: The melanoma antigen gene as a surveillance marker for the detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 104: 251–256.CrossRefPubMed 7. Benoy IH, Elst H, Auwera I, Van Laere S, van Dam P, Van Marck E, Scharpe S, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY: PKC412 in vitro Real-time RT-PCR correlates with immunocytochemistry for the detection of disseminated epithelial

cells in bone marrow aspirates of patients with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2004, 91: 1813–1820.CrossRefPubMed 8. Hayes DF, Walker TM, Singh B, Vitetta ES, Uhr JW, Gross S, Rao C, Doyle GV, Terstappen Bay 11-7085 LW: Monitoring expression of HER-2 on circulating epithelial cells in patients with advanced breast cancer. Int J Oncol 2002, 21: 1111–1117.PubMed 9. Hauch S, Zimmermann S, Lankiewicz S, Zieglschmid

V, Bocher O, Albert WH: The clinical significance of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer and colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res 2007, 27: 1337–1341.PubMed 10. Cristofanilli M, Hayes DF, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Matera J, Allard WJ, Miller MC, Fritsche HA, Hortobagyi GN, Terstappen LW: Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 1420–1430.CrossRefPubMed 11. Ge M, Shi D, Wu Q, Wang M, Li L: Fluctuation of circulating tumor cells in patients with lung cancer by real-time fluorescent quantitative-PCR approach before and after radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2005, 1: 221–226.CrossRefPubMed 12. Zhong LP, Zhao SF, Chen GF, Ping FY, Xu ZF, Hu JA: Increased levels of CK19 mRNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue detected by relative quantification with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Arch Oral Biol 2006, 51: 1112–1119.CrossRefPubMed 13.

Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Entomol 76:103–122 Drapela T, Moser D, Z

Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Entomol 76:103–122 Drapela T, Moser D, Zaller JG, Frank T (2008) Spider assemblages in winter oilseed rape affected by landscape and site factors. Ecography 31:254–262CrossRef Duelli P, Obrist MK (2003) Regional biodiversity in an agricultural landscape: the contribution of seminatural habitat islands. Basic Appl Ecol 4:129–138CrossRef Ekschmitt

K, Griffiths BS (1998) Soil biodiversity and its implications for ecosystem functioning in a heterogeneous and variable environment. Appl Soil Ecol 10:201–215CrossRef Frank T, Reichhart B (2004) Staphylinidae and Carabidae overwintering in wheat and sown wildflower areas of different age. Bull Entomol Res 94:209–217CrossRefPubMed Gibson RH, Pearce S, Morris RJ, Symondson WOC, Memmott J (2007) #PD98059 price randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm approach. J Appl Ecol 44:792–803CrossRef Glen DM, Moens R (2002) Agriolimacidae, Arionidae and Milacidae as pests in west European cereals. In: Barker GM (ed) Molluscs as crop GS-9973 datasheet pests. CABI, Wallingford, pp 271–300CrossRef Greenslade PJM (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33:301–310CrossRef Gregory RD, Noble DG,

Custance J (2004) The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis 146:1–13CrossRef Harvey JA, Van der Putten WH, Turin H, Wagenaar R, Bezemer TM (2008) Effects of changes in plant species richness and community traits on carabid assemblages and feeding guilds. Agric Ecosyst Environ C59 127:100–106CrossRef Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, Van Hal JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA (2004) Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019–1020CrossRefPubMed Hovd H, Skogen A (2005) Plant species in arable field margins and road verges of central Norway. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:257–265CrossRef Judd KW, Mason CF (1995) Colonization of a restored

landfill site by invertebrates, with particular reference to the Coleoptera. Pedobiologia 39:116–125 Kleijn D, Joenje W, Le Coeur D, Marshall EJP (1998) Similarities in vegetation development of newly established herbaceous strips along contrasting European field boundaries. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68:13–26CrossRef Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413:723–725CrossRefPubMed Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Díaz M, De Esteban J, Fernández F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Jöhl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

Curr Microbiol 1981, 6:417–425 CrossRef 45 Wood WB: Host specifi

Curr Microbiol 1981, 6:417–425.CrossRef 45. Wood WB: Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli : bacterial mutations affecting the restriction and modification of DNA. J Mol Biol 1966, 16:118–133.PubMedCrossRef 46. Nakano Y, Yoshida Y, Yamashita Y, Koga T: Construction of a series of pACYC-derived plasmid vectors. Gene 1995, 162:157–158.PubMedCrossRef

Authors’ contributions YC participated in the discovery and characterization of Carocin S2, and he wrote this manuscript. JL participated in protein purification. HP participated in manuscript preparation. KC supported the Pcc strain SP33 and for insightful discussion JNK-IN-8 ic50 and guidance. DY conceived of the study, participated in its design, and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of

the manuscript.”
“Background Oxygen is important for many organisms; because of its high redox potential, it is a common electron acceptor in cellular respiration. However, diverse metabolic reactions generate cell-damaging reactive oxygen species such as superoxide (O2 -) and hydrogen peroxide as byproducts. In response, cells have developed oxidative stress defense systems to protect themselves from oxidative damage. Microorganisms are classified into three selleck screening library large categories–aerobic, anaerobic, and microaerophilic–on the basis of their ability to use oxygen as an electron acceptor during ATP generation. Microaerophiles show optimal growth at 2% to 10% O2, but Wortmannin cannot survive under the normal atmospheric level of O2 [1]. Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is a gram-negative human pathogen that resides in the mucus layer of the stomach. It affects more than half of the world’s population and is often associated with gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer [2, 3]. Numerous studies have shown that Hp uses both aerobic respiration and fermentation pathways. Complete genome sequencing and studies of Hp

metabolism and physiology indicate that Hp uses glucose as its primary energy Reverse transcriptase and carbon source by the Entner-Doudoroff and pentose phosphate pathways [4–9]. Depending on culture conditions, Hp anaerobically produces lactate and acetate from pyruvate or aerobically produces acetate or CO2 [4, 7, 10, 11]. Hp metabolizes pyruvate by the anaerobic mixed acid fermentation pathway, accumulating alanine, lactate, acetate, formate, and succinate [12]. It also uses the tricarboxylic acid cycle, which appears to be a noncyclic, branched pathway characteristic of anaerobic metabolism that produces succinate in the reductive dicarboxylic acid branch and α-ketoglutarate in the oxidative tricarboxylic acid branch [13]. Hp constitutively expresses the aerobic respiratory chain with a cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase as the terminal oxidase [14].

Lin L, Qin Y, Jin T, Liu S, Zhang S, Shen X, Lin Z: Significance

Lin L, Qin Y, Jin T, Liu S, Zhang S, Shen X, Lin Z: Significance of NQO1 overexpression for prognostic evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol 2013. DOI: 10.1016 /j.yexmp. 2013.12.008 29. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Matsuda Y, Korita PV, Takamura M, Ajioka Y, Hatakeyama K: Prognostic significance of NQO1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2011,4(4):363–370.PubMedCentralPubMed Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions YY and YZ contributed equally to this work. TSA HDAC ic50 All authors read and approved

the final manuscript.”
“I don’t do quagmires Donald Rumsfeld US Department of Defence News Briefing, July 2003 “The leadership of NOF

and ISCD has decided after long and careful consideration that a FRAX® filter should be available, and this will happen in the USA.” So speak the proponents of the US FRAX® filter. Unfortunately, the careful consideration appears to have been driven more by threat than opportunity. In the absence of publication of the in-depth reasons, the only argument, regrettably, appears to be that of maintaining the status quo, justified under the flag of minimising confusion. The question remains as to who is confused? The concept of combining risk factors to provide an estimate of risk that can then drive intervention is well established in many disease areas, particularly in cardiovascular disease. Most clinicians, even “non-expert” ones, understand this and it has made a dramatic impact on health outcomes. The failure to perceive

FRAX® not only PF-4708671 manufacturer as a risk calculator but also an educational tool that opens access to better management implies that the NOF and ISCD regard clinicians in the US as less capable than elsewhere. If their purpose is to eliminate uncertainty, then it follows that information on BMD at sites other than the femoral neck or lumbar Amrubicin spine should be filtered in all bar exceptional circumstances. It also follows that BMD should not be reported in CCI-779 mouse patients on treatment, nor T-scores in premenopausal women. The list is endless. An alternative interpretation is that they espouse protectionism over a disease that should lie within the remit of every capable clinician to manage appropriately, referring to expert centres when necessary. The objective of FRAX®, conceived and developed in close collaboration with the NOF and ISCD, is to provide clinicians and patients with information on fracture risk that adds to that derived from BMD alone. For the NOF to retreat from this by only partially implementing FRAX® seems both short sighted and misguided. There is no gold standard and to regard BMD thresholds as such does the whole field a disservice. Of course, it is true that situations will arise where the calculated fracture probability might suggest that guidance based on BMD alone is misleading.

Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76:4004 CrossRef 8 Shaheen SA, Mendoza WA:

Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76:4004.CrossRef 8. Shaheen SA, Mendoza WA: Origin of multiple magnetic transitions in CeSi x systems. Phys Rev B 1999, 60:9501.CrossRef 9. Drotzigera S, Pfleiderera C, Uhlarza M, Lo , Löhneysena H, Souptelc D, Löserc W, Behr G: Pressure-induced magnetic quantum Sotrastaurin chemical structure phase transition in CeSi 1:81 . Physica B 2005, 359–361:92.CrossRef 10. Smith

JS, Zan JA, Lin CL, Li J: Electric, thermal and magnetic properties of CeSi x with 1.57 < x ≤ 2.0. J Appl Phys 2005, 97:10A905.CrossRef 11. Ehm D, Hüfner S, Reinert F, Kroha J, Wölfle P, Stockert O, Geibel C, Löhneysen H: High-resolution photoemission study on low- T K Ce systems: Kondo resonance, crystal field structures, and their temperature dependence. Phys Rev B 2007, 76:045117.CrossRef 12. Zhang H, Mudryk Y, Cao Q, Pecharsky VK, Gschneidner check details KA, Long Y: Phase relationships, and structural,

magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties in the Ce 5 Si 4 –Ce 5 Ge 4 system. J Appl Phys 2010, 107:013909.CrossRef 13. Wosylus A, Meier K, Prots Y, Schnelle W, Rosner H, Schwarz U, Grin Y: Unusual silicon connectivities in the binary compounds GdSi 5 , CeSi 5 , and Ce 2 Si 7 . Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49:9002.CrossRef 14. learn more Yokota T, Fujimura N, Ito T: Effect of substitutionally dissolved Ce in Si on the magnetic and electric properties of magnetic semiconductor Si 1-x Ce x films. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81:4023.CrossRef 15. Yokota T, Fujimura N, Wada T, Hamasaki S, Ito T: Effect of carrier for magnetic and magnetotransport properties of Si:Ce films. J Appl Phys 2003, 93:7679.CrossRef 16. Terao T, Nishimura Y, Shindo D, Yoshimura T, Ashida A, Fujimura N: Magnetic properties of low-temperature grown Si:Ce thin films on (001)Si substrate. J Magn Magn Mater 2007, 310:e726.CrossRef 17. Žutić I, Fabian J, Erwin SC: Spin injection and detection in silicon. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97:026602.CrossRef 18. Appelbaum I, Huang B, Monsma DJ: PLEK2 Electronic measurement and control of spin transport

in silicon. Nature 2007, 447:295.CrossRef 19. Goshtasbi Rad M, Göthelid M, Le Lay G, Karlsson UO: Cerium-induced reconstructions on the Si(111) surface. Surf Sci 2004, 558:49.CrossRef 20. Lee HG, Lee D, Kim S, Hwang C: One-dimensional chain structures produced by Ce on Si(111). Surf Sci 2005, 596:39.CrossRef 21. Lee HG, Lee D, Lim DK, Kim S, Hwang C: One-dimensional chain structure produced by Ce on vicinal Si(100). Surf Sci 2006, 600:1283.CrossRef 22. Gambardella P, Dallmeyer A, Maiti K, Malagoli MC, Eberhardt W, Kern K, Carbone C: Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains. Nature 2002, 416:301.CrossRef 23. Hong IH, Tsai YF, Chen TM: Self-organization of mesoscopically ordered parallel Gd-silicide nanowire arrays on a Si(110)-16 × 2 surface: A massively parallel active architecture. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98:193118.CrossRef 24.

Infect Immun 1999,67(3):1213–1219 PubMed 69 Hancock LE, Gilmore

Infect Immun 1999,67(3):1213–1219.PubMed 69. Hancock LE, Gilmore MS: The capsular polysaccharide of Enterococcus faecalis and its relationship to other polysaccharides in the cell wall. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002,99(3):1574–1579.PubMed 70. Xu Y, Singh KV, Qin X, Murray BE, Weinstock GM: Analysis of a gene cluster of Enterococcus faecalis involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Infect Immun 2000,68(2):815–823.PubMed 71. Sillanpaa J, Nallapareddy

SR, Singh KV, Prakash VP, Fothergill Selleck VS-4718 T, Ton-That H, Murray BE: Characterization of the ebp(fm) pilus-encoding operon of Enterococcus faecium and its role in biofilm formation and virulence in a murine model of urinary tract infection. Virulence 2010,1(4):236–246.PubMed 72. Hendrickx AP, van Luit-Asbroek M, Schapendonk CM, van Wamel WJ, Braat JC, Wijnands LM, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ: SgrA, a nidogen-binding LPXTG surface adhesin implicated in biofilm formation, and EcbA, a collagen binding MSCRAMM, are two novel adhesins of hospital-acquired Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 2009,77(11):5097–5106.PubMed 73. Coque TM, Tomayko JF, Ricke SC, Okhyusen PC, Murray BE: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from nosocomial, community, and animal sources in the United States. Antimicrob

Agents Chemother 1996,40(11):2605–2609.PubMed 74. Wilson K: Preparation

of Genomic DNA from Bacteria. Green Publishing Associates, Brooklyn, N.Y.; 1994. 75. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL: Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007,23(6):673–679.PubMed 76. Besemer J, Borodovsky M: Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 1999,27(19):3911–3920.PubMed 77. Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic KU-57788 sequence. Selleck Gemcitabine Nucleic Acids Res 1997,25(5):955–964.PubMed 78. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW: RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007,35(9):3100–3108.PubMed 79. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A: Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005,33((Database issue)):D121–124.PubMed 80. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, et al.: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010,38((Database issue)):D211–222.PubMed 81. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000,28(1):33–36.PubMed 82.